ca. February 22, 1971: USACIL Report P-FA-D-C-FP-82-70-R21
Page 1 Paragraph 1: Comparison of the known hair of Exhibit E320 with the unknown hair of Exhibits E4 and E5 found same to be dissimilar in physical characteristics. Page 2 Paragraph 2: It is the opinion of the examiner that the hair of Exhibit E320 did not have a common source of origin with the hair of Exhibit E4 and Exhibit E5. |
ca. April 20, 1971: USACIL Report P-FA-D-C-FP-82-70-R24
Page 2 Paragraph 6: Comparative examination of the hairs of Exhibit E321 showed same to be similar in gross color, pigmentation and structure to the dark hairs removed from Exhibits E323 and E35.
Webmaster note: With reference to Exhibit E35 in this report, this exhibit is described on page 1 of this report as "Hair brush from under body of Colette MacDonald." This hairbrush is listed as Exhibit D35 in the final USACIL Consolidated Report, and no Exhibit E35 is listed there. Since hair exhibits were given an "E" designation, the CID obviously used E35 to refer to hairs found in Exhibit D35. |
ca. May 25, 1971: USACIL Report P-FA-D-C-FP-82-70-R25
Page 1 Paragraph 1: Comparative examination of the hairs from Exhibit E324 with the hairs from Exhibits E322, E323, E325, E4 and E5 showed same to be dissimilar in physical characteristics. Page 2 Paragraph 3: Comparative examination of the hairs from Exhibit E325 with the hairs from Exhibits E322, E305 - E313, E320, E321, E4 and E5 showed same to be dissimilar in physical characteristics. |
ca. September 20, 1971: USACIL Report P-D-FA-C-FP-82-70-R29
Page 2 and Page 3 Paragraph 6: Examination of Exhibits D233 through D239, D256, E4 and E5 did not reveal the presence of any skin particles. |
March 29, 1972: USACIL Consolidated Report
Page 17 Paragraph 1: Examination of Exhibits E5, E19a, D23, E63NB, E116, D118, E119, E301 and E303 revealed the presence of wood splinters identical in type, color, texture, and all other physical characteristics to the wood of Exhibit A. Paragraph 2: It is the opinion of the examiner that the wood splinters present in the Exhibits listed in paragraph 1 could have originated from Exhibit A. Page 20 Paragraph 35: Examination of Exhibits D209, D227, D229, E3, E5, E7, E19a, E20a, E22, E50, E63NB, E210 and E302 revealed the presence of human head hairs, grossly similar in all physical characteristics to the head hair of Colette MacDonald. Paragraph 36: It is the opinion of the examiner that one or more of the human head hairs present in the Exhibits of paragraph 35 could have originated from the head of Colette MacDonald. Page 21 Paragraph 50: Examination of the known hair from Exhibits E314 through E319 found same to have different physical characteristics to the hair of Exhibits E4 and E5. Paragraph 51: It is the opinion of the examiner that the hair from Exhibits E314 through E319 and the unknown hair of Exhibits E4 and E5 did not have a common source of origin. Page 22 Paragraph 57: Comparative examinations of the hairs from Exhibits E4 and E5 revealed the same to be dissimilar to the hairs from Exhibits E305 through E313.
|
Full transcript (cover letter)
Full transcript (DNA Report) Page 4: The following specimens yielded mitochondrial DNA sequences consistent with one another (Group B):
Page 6: The following specimens were received May 17, 1999 from the Federal Bureau of Investigation, Washington, DC:
|
A | Piece of wood 31" x 1 1/2" x 1 1/2" bearing red-brown and white stains |
D233 | Fingernail scrapings from left hand of Colette MacDonald |
D256 | Debris from Colette MacDonald's hands, including red crusts |
D37NB | Green throw rug bearing red-brown stains from north bedroom |
K15-K18 | Arm hair samples from Jeffrey MacDonald |